U.S. Supreme Court
Women Defendants Contributed Mightily to First Amendment Jurisprudence
As we celebrate the 100th anniversary of ratification of the 19th Amendment, we should also remember the courageous female defendants who often faced persecution, ostracism and scorn, merely for holding dissident political views.
Read More
Federal Appeals Court Grants Qualified Immunity to University Officials, Denies Medical Student’s First Amendment Claim for Punishment Over Social Media Post
A previous U.S. Supreme Court’s qualified immunity decision, continues to do significant damage in First Amendment jurisprudence. In this case, regards to punishing a university student for an off-campus Facebook post.
Read More
Long Before Trump Complained About Libel Laws, President Teddy Roosevelt Was Sued for Libel
President Trump has said the nation’s libel laws need to be “opened up” to make it easier for public officials like himself to undertake libel lawsuits, though it did not keep him from criticizing his enemies or attacking libel laws since then.
Read More
A ‘More Modest’ Approach: Making Lemonade Without Lemon
A recent court case deliberated over the deconstruction of the Bladensburg Cross due to citizens regarding it to be offending rather then a memorial honoring WW1 soldiers.
Read More
Let’s Get ‘Mad as Hell’ About the Vital Information We Won’t Get to See
A democratic republic based in the ultimate authority of an informed electorate requires the highest degree of government transparency.
Read More
John Paul Stevens Had ‘Indelible” Commitment to First Amendment
Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who served nearly 35 years on the court, left an indelible mark on many areas of First Amendment jurisprudence.
Read More
Then and Now, Flag Burner Benefits From 1989 First Amendment Ruling
Thirty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark free speech decision, ruling that burning the U.S. flag was a form of “expressive conduct.”
Read More
When Is a Religious Symbol Not a Religious Symbol?
The Supreme Court case that explores whether courts or government agencies are competent to adjudicate what is religious and what is not.
Read More
An Anything Goes Approach to Trademarks: The FUCT Clothing Line
Lack of a trademark does not stop clothing manufacturers from using a brand name such as “FUCT,” but does deny certain benefits, such as protection from imitators.
Read More
50 Years Ago, the Court Enters the True Threats Thicket in Watts v. United States
The case should be celebrated for emphasizing the importance of politically charged advocacy and ensuring that such advocacies are not misconstrued as true threats.
Read More