U.S. Supreme Court
A ‘More Modest’ Approach: Making Lemonade Without Lemon
A recent court case deliberated over the deconstruction of the Bladensburg Cross due to citizens regarding it to be offending rather then a memorial honoring WW1 soldiers.
Read More
Let’s Get ‘Mad as Hell’ About the Vital Information We Won’t Get to See
A democratic republic based in the ultimate authority of an informed electorate requires the highest degree of government transparency.
Read More
John Paul Stevens Had ‘Indelible” Commitment to First Amendment
Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who served nearly 35 years on the court, left an indelible mark on many areas of First Amendment jurisprudence.
Read More
Then and Now, Flag Burner Benefits From 1989 First Amendment Ruling
Thirty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark free speech decision, ruling that burning the U.S. flag was a form of “expressive conduct.”
Read More
When Is a Religious Symbol Not a Religious Symbol?
The Supreme Court case that explores whether courts or government agencies are competent to adjudicate what is religious and what is not.
Read More
An Anything Goes Approach to Trademarks: The FUCT Clothing Line
Lack of a trademark does not stop clothing manufacturers from using a brand name such as “FUCT,” but does deny certain benefits, such as protection from imitators.
Read More
50 Years Ago, the Court Enters the True Threats Thicket in Watts v. United States
The case should be celebrated for emphasizing the importance of politically charged advocacy and ensuring that such advocacies are not misconstrued as true threats.
Read More
Roscoe Jones – First Amendment Hero
This African-American Jehovah Witness preacher had the temerity to travel all across the Southeast promoting his religious faith even in all-white areas.
Read More
Bible Literacy or Bible Wars?
Yes, Mr. President, biblical literacy can be part of a public school education – if, and only if, schools are prepared to do it right under the First Amendment.
Read More
Times-Palin ruling good for free speech, press
The court’s decision upholds First Amendment laws that protect not only journalists, but also members of the public who express political opinions.
Read More