First Five
First Five Podcast: A conversation with a college journalism adviser
The fourth in a series of episodes exploring student journalism and celebrating 2019’s Year of the Student Journalist.
Read More
Existing Libel Laws Protect the Right to Speak Freely – For All of Us
Make no mistake: The impact of chilling or weakening the Times legal protections will reach into every home, every cellphone and every social media post.
Read More
First Five Podcast: A conversation with a college journalist
The third in a series of episodes exploring student journalism and celebrating 2019’s Year of the Student Journalist.
Read More
‘First Five’ Commentary on First Amendment Issues Returns to Weekly Distribution
The “First Five” weekly column replaces the commentary known as “Inside the First Amendment,” written by various Institute staff since the mid-1990s.
Read More
First Five Podcast: A conversation with a high school journalist
The second in a series exploring student journalism and celebrating 2019’s Year of the Student Journalist.
Read More
First Five Podcast: Year of the Student Journalist
Special guest Adriana Chavira, advisor to student publications at Daniel Pearl Magnet High School, kicks off the first of eight episodes celebrating the “Year of the Student Journalist.”
Read More
Podcast: Free Spirits, or Discussing the State of the First Amendment Over Drinks
What do Americans know about the First Amendment, and how do they feel about issues like social media policies, campus speech and the relationship between the press and the President?
Read More
Podcast: Protecting Dissent
While most people are distracted by watching the White House, states are trying to pass laws that will chill the freedom to protest.
Read More
Podcast: Context, Please
How can the news media help people understand complex issues? By providing a little context.
Read More
Podcast: Deconstructing the “Gay Wedding Cake” Case
Lata Nott delves into one of the most controversial cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this year, Masterpiece Cakeshop, and what the Court’s decision means for First Amendment and LGBTQ rights.
Read More