Brief scores shall constitute fifty percent (50%) of each team’s score in Preliminary Round One and fifty percent (50%) of each team’s score in Preliminary Round Two.
A panel of judges will score the briefs. Briefs will be evaluated anonymously and graded on a scale of one (1) to one hundred (100) points. After a team’s brief score has been determined, penalties for formatting and citation errors, as well as any penalties for rule violations, will be subtracted from the initial score given.
The following chart provides the point deductions for format and citation errors:
|FORMAT ERRORS||POINT DEDUCTIONS|
|Non-one inch margin||2|
|Non-double spaced text and single spaced footnotes||2|
|Non-12 point Times New Roman font including footnotes||2|
|Non-8 ½ x11 paper||2|
|Non-Compliance with Rule 24(1)(a)-(j) of the Rules of the United States Supreme Court||2/per error|
|Pages in excess of 40 not including those pages discussed in Rule III(D)(2)(h)||1/page|
|Competitor names or name of team including law school on any location except on front cover of measuring brief||1/per occurrence|
|Late submission of briefs to Vice Chancellors||5/day|
|Submission of wrong side brief||10|
|Failure to include brief certificate to Vice Chancellor (Includes: 1) A statement that the work product contained in all copies of the team’s brief are the work product of the members of the team only; 2) A statement that the team has complied fully with its law school honor code; and 3) An acknowledgment that the team has complied with all the Rules of the Competition).||1|
|Failure to submit Measuring Brief to Vice Chancellor (Includes: 1) Typewritten names of all team members; 2) Their signatures; 3) Team number assigned by the Vice Chancellor and; 4) The name of their law school on the front cover page of the brief)||1|
|Minor Citation Errors – does not impair the ability of the reader to identify or find the authority and that does not misrepresent the material.||½ point/per error|
|Major Citation Errors – affects the ability of the reader to find or identify the authority or misrepresents the material.||1/per error|
The first day of the Competition will be held at Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America, 3600 John McCormack Road, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20064. The second day of the Competition will be at the Newseum, 555 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20001.
Scoring of Oral Arguments
Each team will argue once for the Petitioner and once for the Respondent during the preliminary rounds.
The teams’ score for the preliminary rounds will be based on the score for the brief and the score for the oral argument. In Round 1 and Round 2, the brief will constitute fifty percent (50%) of the score.
For the quarterfinal rounds, the competition Vice Chancellors will randomly determine which teams argue for Petitioner and Respondent. For the semifinal and final rounds, there will be a coin toss to decide which teams argue for Petitioner and Respondent.
The teams’ score for the quarterfinal, semifinal, and final rounds will be based entirely on oral argument performance.
In the quarterfinal round the two teams with the highest score before each of the two panels of judges will advance to the semifinal round. In the semifinal round the two teams that win the arguments will advance to the final round.
All scoring will be judged on a scale of 100 in whole numbers. If a judge provides a score other than a whole number, the number will be rounded to the nearest whole number. Each preliminary oral round will consist of three oral scores. There will be a minimum of two oral judges in each room. In the event that only two judges are present, the third score will be computed by averaging the two scores to create the third score. If there are three judges in the room then one score will be taken from each judge.
In the event of a tie in determining the top two teams, the following procedures will be used by the Vice Chancellors in the following order:
Third place will be determined by calculating the third highest score in the semifinals.