Curses! Blasphemy, profanity laws still on the books

Can you say that in public?

Watch your language out there, because profanity and blasphemy could lead to criminal charges.

We might hope that First Amendment-protected free speech lets us utter profanities, blasphemies and other choice phrases that occasionally slip from our intemperate tongues. After all, the U.S. Supreme Court protected a man who wore a jacket into a Los Angeles County Courthouse bearing the words “Fuck the Draft.” That led to the famous Cohen v. California (1971) ruling in which Justice John Marshall Harlan — a conservative during the Warren Court years — uttered a phrase that has become First Amendment lore: “One man’s vulgarity is another’s lyric.”

But hold on. Yes, in a free society adult citizens outside of special contexts (jobs, military, school) can speak their minds in the open air. But if you think old laws punishing profanity and blasphemy no longer exist, you’re wrong — a surprising number of state laws still prohibit such speech.  Even though the laws are rarely enforced, they are still on the books.

Don’t you solemnly swear
Massachusetts’ blasphemy law threatens that:

“Whoever willfully blasphemes the holy name of God by denying, cursing, or contumeliously reproaching God, his creation, government or final judging of the word, or by cursing or contumeliously reproaching Jesus Christ or the Holy Ghost, or by cursing or contumeliously reproaching or exposing to contempt and ridicule, the holy word of God contained in the holy scriptures shall be punished by imprisonment in jail for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than three hundred dollars, and may also be bound to good behavior.”

Michigan’s blasphemy law says: “Any person who shall willfully blaspheme the holy name of God, by cursing or contumeliously reproaching God, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”

Oklahoma law provides: “Blasphemy consists in wantonly uttering or punishing words, casting contumelious reproach or profane ridicule upon God, Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost, the Holy Scriptures, or the Christian or any other religion.” Uttering such speech is classified as a misdemeanor.

Other states have general anti-profanity laws conceived to protect society from the potty-mouthed. Consider this Mississippi law:

“If any person shall profanely swear or curse, or use vulgar and indecent language, or be drunk in any public place, in the presence of two (2) or more persons, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) or be imprisoned in the county jail not more than thirty (30) days each.”

Another Mississippi law prohibits entering “the dwelling house of another” and using “abusive, profane, vulgar or indecent language.”

Drivers beware, as well. Some states have laws that specifically limit cursing on public highways.

A North Carolina law states: “If any person shall, on any public road or highway and in the hearing of two or more persons, in a loud and boisterous manner, use indecent or profane language, he shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.”

Some anti-profanity laws were passed to shield women and children from foul-mouthed men. Consider this Michigan law: “Any person who shall use any indecent, immoral, obscene, vulgar or insulting language in the presence or hearing of any woman or child shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”

Another Oklahoma law warns, “If any person shall utter or speak any obscene or lascivious language or word in any public place, or in the presence of females, or in the presence of children under ten (10) years of age, he shall be liable to a fine of not more than One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), or imprisonment for not more than thirty (30) days, or both.”

Some states, at least, don’t impose hundreds of dollars in fines for cursing and swearing.

Under Rhode Island’s profanity law, “Every person who shall be guilty of profane swearing and cursing shall be fined not exceeding five dollars ($5.00).”

Are they enforced?
Having some of these laws on the books is troubling from a First Amendment perspective. And some of them are still enforced.

In United States v. Flowers (2007), a federal district court in North Carolina upheld the conviction of man for cursing at police officers on a public highway. The court interpreted the broadly worded profanity law as applying only to fighting words — words likely to provoke an immediate breach of the peace.

Consider too the plight of the cussing canoeist Timothy Boomer, who in 1999 was charged and convicted for violating a Michigan anti-profanity law designed to protect women and children.

Boomer hit a rock and took a spill while canoeing down the Rifle River. Upon resurfacing he let loose what a sheriff’s deputy characterized as three minutes of profanity within hearing distance of a father, mother and their two youngsters. Though a Michigan appeals court later tossed the conviction, Boomer remained known as “the cussing canoeist.” He told the Associated Press in 2002: “I’m a little more careful about what I say in public these days.”

Perhaps more should take heed of Timothy Boomer’s warning. Check your state codes.

14 thoughts on “Curses! Blasphemy, profanity laws still on the books

  1. Make it a Law to ban Socialism and communism even though the foul-mouthed radically left-wing thugs who are supposedly elected to run our beloved nation our bound determined to give up the Practice to a new and equally deadly misdeed to give a curse to freedom and make it a blessed event to destroy it. That’s right, America wake up and smell that. Aw, shucks what’s the fuss, I’m not a politician I am an real patriotic American so I go to resort to one thing live out an God-fearing life living in American. Pray I will never say the title of a recently shown motion picture film: Meet the F***ers!!! ——An angry but decent-language true American patriot😍🇺🇸 #BanProfanity4ever

  2. My son recently cursed me out over the cell phone using all sorts of profanity while our local Sheriffs Duty stood right next to me listening. I cautioned my son that it was illegal to conduct yourself over the airwaves in the fashion and he assured me that no such laws of any kind existed! Would you care to comment on this line of questioning?

    • It’s not your right if it causes a man’s wife undo distress and to be uncomfortable which invokes the husband or mate to construe this to be showing disrespect to his mate,
      fighting words.

  3. It is disgusting to hear the language used by some too many people, girls included. It makes one wondering if they studied English in school and if they kiss their mother or their kids with the same mouth that uttered those vulgar words they should be ashamed.

    • I agree. It seems that more and more people these days are using it and it is everywhere you go and on a regular basis as part of their normal conversation. I wound up finding this article because I’m looking to see if RI had an anti-profanity law as I’m having trouble with a tenant and neighbors cussing and swearing every 5 minutes and in front of their own small children!! It’s disgusting and disrespectful. I am guilty of swearing when I get hurt, but I am trying to change that, and I rarely say it.

      • Why in hell do these laws exist? If anything, they should have been destroyed years ago, especially now. With movements like the SJW movement, this would be considered sexist by them. I normally wouldn’t side with SJWs, but this is kinda sexist. I’m amazed nobody on the left is up in arms about these laws.

        • These laws exist because, before 1985 ( or the Free-Love movement of the 1960’s) there was a whole country that collectively felt that — if you can’t say something good, don’t say anything at all. Educated people in that era would analyze a yokel’s phrase about a “damned boat motor” that wouldn’t start, and they would ask, “why can’t it just be a “boat motor” that wouldn’t start — adding “damned” to the phrase is superfluous nonsense. Nonsense — precisely because that non-starting boat motor will not be going to Hell. It has no Soul to be condemned (i.e. damned) to Hell.

          College Composition professors, back in that by-gone era, would mark-down any papers that added superfluous — and meaningless — filler words.

          Who the Hell,
          What the Hell,
          When the f–k,
          Where the Hell,
          Why the f–k (or the Hell)

          were always only acceptable as;

          Who,
          What,
          When,
          Where,
          Why.
          —continued—

          • The way to get Society (and law-makers) to allow profanity to gush from our mouths, anytime, anywhere, is to fight for a nationwide law that OUTLAWS the use of contractions in word or speech. It is the hypocritical use of contractions that causes all this confusion. Allowing a person to use contractions (to shorten either the spoken word, or the written word), but then also allowing that person to needlessly add superfluous, meaningless, nonsense words to puff-up the speech or writing far beyond what it would have been — is what causes brain-cells to explode.

            The phrase,

            “Jesus motherfucking Christ, who the hell thought this god-damned shit was a good idea?”

            is far more colorful, and extremely more lengthy than its pre-1985 co-extensive equivalent,

            “Who thought this was a good idea?”

            —continued—

    • Who is the arbiter of what is considered profanity? I think it is stupid to designate certain words as profane. People CHOOSE to be offended at certain words because they aren’t smart enough to decide for themselves not to be offended.

    • Today, under an American flag flies a “F***k Biden (and f***k you too if you voted for him”
      It sits two houses down from an Air B&B that I manage for a friend who lives in Seattle. It supplements her income.
      I don’t have kids, so I just kind of laughed. But, as I’ve thought about it, I have questions…!?!

    • “It makes one wondering if they studied English in school and if they kiss their mother or their kids with the same mouth that uttered those vulgar words they should be ashamed” —the living embodiment of irony.
      Bad look using worse grammar than someone with ESL in a rant where you so publicly call people out for a lack of comprehension of the English language.
      In my experience, you don’t hear many people who have above average IQ/intelligence and/or general competence complain about profanity. It’s always the dim ones that have enough empty headspace to choose to be bothered by certain words that someone arbitrarily just decided are bad, even when other words for virtually the exact same concept are just as arbitrarily deemed appropriate. The clever ones, on the other hand, don’t have the instinct for kneeling/following that compels the weaker minded to behave strangely just because the person next to them is doing it.

      • “In my experience, you don’t hear many people who have above average IQ/intelligence and/or general competence complain about profanity.”

        Hahahahahahahahaha! Yeah, right.

        Or, maybe you are correct. My experience is different. At the emplyment interview for a Management job, the prospect who answered the interviewer’s question with, “Hell yeah, I want this motherfucking job! You bastards rock!” was not called back.

        The College student who started her Physics research paper with, “That motherfucking bastard, Enrico Fermi had some Gonzo theories that put all his contemporaries theories in the shitter!

        And the parishioner who stood, clapping, after the Sermon, and said loudly, “Jesus motherfucking Christ pastor! That was the best god-damned motherfucking sermon I’ve ever heard, about those bastards who fuck around on they (i.e. their) bitches, was not asked back to that church.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.